2. In full view of the judgment, the fact that the defendant has been sentenced to a fine due to embezzlement, suspension of execution, etc., the nature of the crime is not good, such as receiving a loan from the victim as security of a false lease contract, and the amount obtained by the defendant through the crime of this case is also a large amount of KRW 100 million, and the defendant does not seem to have made efforts in good faith for the repayment of damage up to the judgment. In addition, in full view of the defendant's age, character, character, character, intelligence and environment, motive and background of the crime, means, method, method and consequence of the crime, criminal record relation, and circumstances before and after the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal of this case is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition.