However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 11, 2019, the Defendant: (a) discovered the occurrence of a traffic accident in front of the 66th Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, the Defendant, who was reported on May 11, 2019; and (b) discovered the occurrence of a traffic accident in front of the 112 distance, and arbitrarily boarded the slope C belonging to the Cheongju Police Station B, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, who

On the same day, at around 22:30, the Defendant found and found the Defendant who was on board the front of the patrol car by the said slope C, and the Defendant refused to leave the patrol car, and the said C, which said C had the Defendant on board the patrol car, followed the Defendant by the said C, and said C, the Defendant was able to bring the Defendant on the patrol car, thereby bringing the Defendant into the said C, and the Defendant was able to read “Ne ..... Mamast f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f.,

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers in the process of reporting 112 cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. 112 Application of the 112 Reporting List, photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation and community service order, Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 44-2 of the Medical Treatment and Custody Act, the reason for sentencing is not consistent with the background of the crime in this case, and the method of committing the crime, etc.

The defendant has been punished several times due to the crime of the same kind or crime, and in particular, even though he had been punished for a suspended sentence of imprisonment due to the act of intimidation by carrying a deadly weapon in 2015, he/she has a high possibility of criticism, such as recidivism.

However, the sentencing conditions, such as the recognition of all contingent crimes committed by the accused, the elderly, and the character and behavior of the accused, the environment, and the conditions before and after the crimes, are considered.