In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, each of them is 100.

1. Defendant A

A. On August 29, 2016, the Defendant interfering with his/her duties may, in order for the victim D to obtain permission to occupy and use farmland from the Gun office located in the Gun office of the Gun and to open a farm road, have employed the body and work site E (hereinafter referred to as “F,” and referring to “F land on the given land”) in the G, which is located in the field of Gyeong-gun, Gun office of the Gun (hereinafter referred to as “F”), which is a site where the victim D continues to work by digging off the body and cutting off, etc., and may prevent the construction from being carried out on the floor if the construction continues.

“Around 10 minutes of force, etc.,” which interfere with the establishment of a victim’s farm road due to the victim’s farming power.

B. On August 30, 2016, from around 09:00 to around 17:00 on September 3, 2016, the Defendant: (a) obstructed traffic along the land by setting up a Track in the width of three meters used by village residents as farming roads (hereinafter “instant farming roads”); and (b) interfered with traffic on the land by placing a Track in the width of three meters from around 20 years to around 17:00.

2. Defendant B

A. On August 29, 2016, the Defendant obstructed the Defendant’s business establishment by force of the victim’s farming by force for about 11 days, by setting up one ton of 1 ton of 1 freight at the starting point of the farm road that the victim D, who was in G, obtained permission for diversion of farmland from the Gun Office (hereinafter “the starting point of the construction site of this case”) established with the permission for diversion of farmland from the Gun Office.

B. On August 29, 2016, around 16:30 on August 29, 2016, the Defendant, at the place indicated in the foregoing paragraph (a), extracted one sign, which was installed to indicate the section for which the Defendant obtained permission for occupation and use after requesting a survey to the branch office of the Korea National Land Information Corporation in the Korea National Land Information Corporation, in order to establish a farm road, and made it impossible for the Defendant to recognize that

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ partial statements

1. Among the facts charged in the instant case involving the witness D and J’s respective legal statements and the defense counsel’s assertion and determination, the Defendant A’s interference with the business of the Defendants and the Defendant B’s interference with the crime is simply denied, and this Court has duly adopted this case’s argument.