beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.10.07 2015고단4863

공무집행방해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 7, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for 6 months and a fine of 300,000 won in Seoul Western District Court on August 7, 201, and the execution of the sentence was completed at Seoul Southern District Court on December 1 of the same year.

1. Around August 10, 2015, the Defendant made a public insult of the victim victim D (year 44) by police officials belonging to the Seoul Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Police Agency, who were dispatched after receiving a report on the Defendant’s act of disturbance, on August 10, 2015, with the large sound called “I am, I am, I am, I am, I am in the country, and I am am, I am.”

2. On August 11, 2015, the Defendant arrested a flagrant offender with disturbance, etc., as indicated in paragraph (1) on August 11, 2015, and moved the patrol car No. 13 to the Seoul Franchi Police Station, and arrived at the front of the Seoul Franchi Police Station, and said that the Defendant requested police officers D (year 44) belonging to the Seoul Franchis to find a slotus.

Then, the above D found the Defendant’s sloter, and expressed the Defendant’s slicker’s slicker’s slicker’s slicker’s slicker’s slicker’s slicker’s slicker’s slicker’s flicker’s left part of D.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the escort and security of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning D;

1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: Application of criminal records and investigation reports (prior convictions of suspects and confirmation of repeated crimes) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing among concurrent crimes, even though there are many criminal offenses of the same kind, the Defendant again committed the instant crime during the period of repeated crimes even though he had a number of criminal offenses of the same kind.

Defendant drinks at the time of committing a crime.