재요양불승인처분취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On June 8, 2004, the Plaintiff sustained an injury due to an accident that happens in excess of the vehicle while carrying steel on a 5-ton vehicle in the place of business under the name of B while serving as an employee.
B. The Plaintiff was recognized as an occupational accident by the foregoing accident, “Woo-man, left salt coordinate on the left side, the left-hand fluoral damage and paralysis damage and paralysis on the left-hand side, and the conical signboard escape certificate No. 6-7.” Accordingly, after receiving medical care from June 12, 2004 to June 30, 2010, the Plaintiff was determined as a disability grade No. 8 subparag. 2 following the completion of medical treatment.
C. On June 21, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an application for medical care benefits again (hereinafter “instant application”) with the Defendant, accompanied by a statement of opinion to the effect that “In the state of scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic and scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopics, from July 8, 2013 to July 15, 2013, and expected to undergo physical therapyscopic scopic scopic scopic sche
On July 4, 2013, the defendant compared the previous examination in 2012 and 2013, and decided not to approve the application for medical care benefits (hereinafter referred to as the "disposition of this case") based on the medical advisory opinion that there was no aggravation opinion, and there was no symptoms of the same symptoms in the past, but there was no symptoms of the same symptoms in the past.
E. The plaintiff filed a request for examination against the defendant, but the defendant rejected the plaintiff's request after deliberation by the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Examination Committee, and the plaintiff filed a request for reexamination to the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Reexamination Committee against the above decision, but the above Committee did so.