손해배상(기)
1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendant are dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.
3. The judgment of the court of first instance is ordered.
1. The reasons for admitting the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows. Paragraph (2) shall apply to the part corresponding to the judgment of the court of first instance, and the defendant's argument for the completion of extinctive prescription newly raised by the court of first instance. Except where the court attached the judgment that "the amount of consolation money recognized by the court of first instance cannot be deemed excessive or insufficient even if considering all the circumstances alleged by the plaintiff and the defendant," it is identical to the part of the judgment of the court of first instance as to the plaintiff, and thus, it shall be cited in accordance with
The "H" of the 3rd parallel 2nd parallel shall be deemed to be "P", and "I" shall be deemed to be "P", respectively.
The 3th 10 to 14th Happ are as follows.
A person shall be appointed.
D. The Defendant was prosecuted for violating the Act on Special Cases concerning Rape, Quasi-Rape, Intimidation, the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes against Plaintiff A, and was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for three years on November 25, 2015 (excluding those of intimidation (excluding those of intimidation determined not guilty; hereinafter the same shall apply) and those of violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (amera, etc.).
(Cheongju District Court Decision 2018Dahap75 decided July 11, 2019). Both the Defendant and the Prosecutor appealed with respect to the above judgment. The appellate court dismissed the Prosecutor’s appeal and sentenced two years to imprisonment with prison labor by recognizing the Defendant to be guilty of the crime of intimidation, violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (Act on the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes) (Seoul High Court Decision 2019No188 decided January 9, 2020), and the above judgment became final and conclusive.
(hereinafter referred to as "relevant criminal judgment"). The 3th 15th 3th 15th 15th 3th 3th 19th 19 and the 33th 3th 3th 3th 3th 3th 34th 1.
4. The phrase "forth" of the 4th parallel of conduct shall be changed to "forth time".
In the 4th parallel 13th parallels, “A person who was sentenced to three years of imprisonment in the first instance court” is deemed to be “a person who was sentenced to two years of imprisonment in the relevant criminal judgment.”
The defendant's 5-6 acts at the bottom of the fourth level "A by using them.