When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On October 31, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1,50,00,000,000,000,00,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,0000,0000,0000,0000,0000,000,0000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,000,000,00,00,

The Defendant’s crime of this case appears to have been committed in the process of having h’s desire and violence before and after the shooting with H.

Around 20:35 on the same day, the fact that the hotel of this case was on the first floor of the hotel of this case is on the victim's hearing by I, who is an employee of the hotel of this case, even though the victim did not have a person with no father's son's son's son's son's son's son

The reputation of the victim was damaged by openly pointing out false facts, such as voice of the large interest.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement with H, and a written statement prepared in I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a complaint, each photograph/cinematographic output, business registration certificate, investigation report (net 27).

1. Article 307 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 307 (1) of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (this Court Decision 2018Da273 was already issued a legal evaluation of shooting between the Defendant and H at the time of the instant case and 273, and in the beginning of the instant case, H did not raise a separate question about defamation on the part of H, and therefore, H appears to have not thought that his reputation was severely damaged. In other words, the Defendant’s reputation was put up for defamation while filing a complaint.