However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a C-si.

피고인은 2015. 7. 31 08:50경 위 택시를 운전하여 서울 강남구 D에 있는 “E제과점”앞 편도 4차로의 도로를 도곡1동 주민센터 방면에서 뱅뱅교차로 방면으로 1차로를 따라 불상의 속도로 진행하던 중 반대차선으로 진행하기 위해 유턴을 하게 되었는데, 그곳은 황색실선의 중앙선이 설치된 곳이므로 운전업무에 종사하는 사람에게는 유턴허용 지점에서 유턴을 해야 할 업무상 주의의무가 있었다.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and caused the victim F(17 years of age) who was getting a bicycle on the opposite lane due to the negligence of the central line, to have the victim F(17 years of age) go beyond the road floor to find a taxi of the defendant and avoid this.

As a result, the Defendant suffered approximately eight weeks off the right frame in need of treatment due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A statement of the occurrence of a traffic accident of F;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing vehicle photographs;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning Criminal Facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62 (1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62 (1) of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Persons who have

1. An order to attend a course is rendered for not less than Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;