2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. 1) In order to operate the reproductive source business, the Plaintiff was planning to newly construct two buildings on the ground of 11,956 square meters on the land owned by the Plaintiff. 2) On June 9, 2006, the Plaintiff was divided from the Defendant into 99 square meters among the land indicated in paragraph (1) of the same Article (2) (3) on August 1, 2006, for the purpose of using it as the sports facilities, etc. of the reproductive source, etc., and the land category of the land was changed to “large” on September 4, 2007.

(3) On the ground, on October 24, 2007, the Plaintiff constructed a new building with a building permit for the construction of a Class II neighborhood living facility (office, sports facility) on the ground, and completed the registration of ownership preservation under the Plaintiff’s name on October 18, 2007. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 19992, Sep. 20, 2006; Presidential Decree No. 19992, Nov. 3, 2006; Presidential Decree No. 19999, Oct. 24, 2007>

() On the ground, a building permit was obtained for the construction of one unit of detached house under the name of E. On August 30, 2007, after changing the name of building permit to F, the building was newly constructed and completed registration of ownership preservation in the name of F on January 14, 2008 (hereinafter referred to as “instant building”) (hereinafter referred to as “registration of ownership preservation”), and the said registration of ownership preservation is called “registration of ownership preservation.”

(B) B. On July 3, 2009, the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to the instant building under the name of the Plaintiff on the ground of sale. (c) The Dobong Tax Office, as a result of the tax investigation, concluded that the Plaintiff was suspected of violating Article 3(1) of the Act on the Registration of Real Estate under Actual Titleholder’s Name by holding the ownership of the instant building under title trust to F and completing the registration of ownership transfer under F, and notified the Defendant of this fact on November 2, 2012.

2. Accordingly, Article 3 of the Act on the Registration of Real Estate under Actual Titleholder’s Name by the Plaintiff’s registration of preservation of ownership of the instant building in F name.