beta
(영문) 서울고등법원 2020.05.14 2019누66974

정보공개거부처분취소

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The court's explanation of this case is the same as the entry of the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of the first instance except for dismissal or addition as follows. Thus, it shall accept it in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The number of pages 4 through 5 shall be 10 as follows: < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 2510, Dec. 1, 201>

Article 7(1)4 of the former Information Disclosure Act (wholly amended by Act No. 7127 of Jan. 29, 2004; hereinafter “former Information Disclosure Act”) provides for the prevention, investigation, execution of punishment, correction, etc. of crimes, which, if disclosed, has considerable grounds for remarkably obstructing the fair performance of duties when disclosed. Article 7(1)5 of the same Act provides that information in the process of decision-making or internal review, which, if disclosed, has considerable grounds for remarkably obstructing the fair performance of duties; subparagraph 6 of the same Article provides that information pertaining to individuals whose identity can be identified by name, resident registration number, etc. included in the relevant information (hereinafter “personal identification information”) shall be subject to non-disclosure, and that information under subparagraphs 4 and 5 shall be subject to non-disclosure, but the specific duties or duties that cause or significantly impede performance of duties or duties are completely different; and information under subparagraphs 4 and 5 shall be subject to non-disclosure in the process of investigation, smooth prevention of and smooth decision-making and correction of the above information.