The punishment sentenced by the court below (three years of imprisonment and three million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

However, the main contents of each of the instant offenses committed by the Defendant are as follows: (a) embezzlement of money that the Defendant had been kept in custody only a day after the Defendant was employed in the delivery company; (b) theft of walleds, stolen goods from the street, etc., or stolen them from the street; and (c) attempted attempted crimes, such as occupational embezzlement, theft, and special robbery continuously committed on several occasions, such as taking a knife with the knife, and taking the knife against the attempted crimes; (d) the Defendant left each of the instant offenses without any reflective force even though the Defendant had been punished several times for the same type of crimes; (e) the number of the crimes was high and most of the damage recovery was not achieved; and (e) taking into account all of the sentencing conditions, such as the Defendant’s age, family relation, criminal record, character and conduct, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, means and method of the crime, etc., the Defendant’s assertion that the Defendant’s punishment was too unreasonable is not reasonable.

Therefore, the appeal by the defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act because the appeal by the defendant is groundless.