배당이의
1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
purport, purport, and.
1. The reasoning of the court of first instance’s admitting this judgment is as follows, in addition to the part concerning which the parties asserted in this court, and the part concerning which the court tried to dismiss or add a judgment as to the part of the first instance judgment, and thus, it is identical to the part concerning the reasoning of the first instance judgment. As such, this court’s
In addition, the reason why the parties asserted in this court is not significantly different from the argument in the first instance court, and even if the evidence submitted in the first instance court and the evidence additionally submitted in this court are examined, the fact-finding and judgment in the first instance court is justifiable.
[Supplementary part] On April 14, 1997, the part "the receipt of April 14, 1997" of the judgment of the court of first instance 3 Myeon 13 Myeon 13 is called "the receipt of the Suwon District Court's Ansan Branch's Office for Public Interest in the case of Ansan."
On December 8, 199, the part of "the receipt on December 8, 199" of the judgment of the court of first instance, 3rd, 17th, 199, is "the receipt of the Suwon District Court's Ansan Branch's Branch's Office of Public Interest".
On the fourth three sides of the judgment of the first instance court, "Defendant C" appears to be "on the basis of the above loan certificate."
In the first instance judgment, the 5th 4th 5th 4th 5th / [founded ground for recognition] did not dispute, the part of Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 14, 19, Eul evidence Nos. 4 Eul and Eul evidence Nos. 18 through 21 (including the number of each branch number in the case of additional evidence No. 4), and the whole purport of pleadings is as follows: "No dispute exists"; Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 14, 15, 19; Eul evidence No. 4; Eul evidence No. 18 through 21 (including the number of each branch number; hereinafter the same shall apply); and the purport of the whole pleadings.
The sum of the principal of the first instance judgment was KRW 403,227,397, the sum of the principal of the said loan was 403,227,397, and the overdue interest rate was applied on May 23, 2002. The sum of the principal was 403,227,397, June 23, 2002.
No. 7 of the judgment of the first instance, 12 of the 7th judgment shall be deleted.
On April 22, 2010, the part of the first instance judgment, 7, 18, "No. 2010," shall be deemed "No. 23, 2010," respectively.
The judgment of the court of first instance is from 7 pages 19 to 8 pages 2, 205.