However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Defendant 1, “2017 Highest 816,” is a person who operates an entertainment center in the Maci City B.

In spite of the fact that no person employed a person who does not have the status of sojourn eligible for job-seeking activities, the Defendant employed a foreigner D from around December 23, 2016 to around April 17, 2017, who did not have the said status of sojourn amongst the above entertainment points, and had the said foreigner provide entertainment services in combination with the customers, and nine foreign workers who did not have the status of sojourn eligible for employment as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table.

The defendant of "2017 Highest 968" is a person who actually operates an entertainment drinking point under B of Gangwon-si, Gangwon-si.

A person shall not employ a foreigner who does not have the status of sojourn eligible for employment activities, but the defendant shall from July 21, 2017 to the same year.

7. Until December 26, 200, Russian E (E and F birth) employed Russian E (E and F birth) who did not have the status of sojourn eligible for job-seeking activities at the above entertainment shop and allowed them to sit in company with customers and provide entertainment.

Summary of Evidence

"2017 Highest 816"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to G and H;

1. Each accusation against an immigration offender, a written confirmation on employment of a foreigner, a written notice of decision on the examination of an immigration offender, nine copies of a written notice of decision on the examination of a foreign immigration offender, a notice of a department related to the report of the case 12, a field photograph "2017 Senior 968";

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. E statements;

1. A notice of decision on examining an immigration offender and the application of statutes governing a certificate of employment of foreigners;

1. Article 94 subparagraph 9 of the relevant Act, Article 18 (3) of the Immigration Control Act, and the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Execution (limited to the defendant who has been punished three times by a fine due to the same kind of crime) and the defendant is tried to commit the crime again.