2. There are circumstances that may be considered favorable to the sentencing of the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant had no record of criminal punishment prior to the instant case, the defendant appears to have been subject to considerable mental stress while supporting the victim with severe dementia symptoms. While being drunk, the crime of this case was committed contingently under the influence of alcohol, the victim’s bereaved family members do not want the punishment of the defendant, and the defendant’s mother's brothers and sisters who are the victim’s bereaved family members are participating in the truth of his/her mistake, and the defendant seems to have participated in the back of his/her suicide and are expected to live a life in the society and in his/her own book

However, the crime of this case was committed by the Defendant’s homicide by influent assaulting the victim’s mother, and above all, it requires strict punishment. In full view of the following factors: (a) the punishment imposed by the lower court is considerably lower than the lower limit of the sentencing guidelines; (b) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime; and (c) all of the sentencing conditions shown in the argument of this case, including the circumstances after the crime, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence, etc., the lower court’s punishment is deemed reasonable and it cannot be deemed unreasonable. Thus, the Defendant’s assertion cannot

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since there is no ground for appeal. It is so decided as per Disposition.