One day if the defendant fails to pay the above fine.

On July 10, 2014, at around 03:40, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender from G and security guards belonging to the F District Police Station of the Busan Central Police Station, who was called up after receiving 112 report by assaulting Eul, who is a taxi engineer, on the street near the Jung-gu, Busan, Busan, on the charge of assaulting Eul, who is a taxi engineer, on July 10, 2014, the Defendant assaulted the police officer at the time when he was arrested as a flagrant offender from G and security guards, who is a police officer belonging to the F District Unit of the Busan Central Police Station of the Busan Central Police Station, on the following occasions: “I am? I do not refuse to leave.” The Defendant assaulted the face face of G once a week.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of police officers in the act of committing the crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The police statement of G and H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (at the time of site entry and exit);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. The grounds for the sentencing of Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act are against the police officer in the process of arresting him as a flagrant offender with the reason for the sentencing of Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, which appears to be a contingent crime, and it does not seem to have committed any other satis after the arrest, and the defendant has no record of criminal punishment before.