특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치상)등
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 12,000,000 won.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Punishment of the crime
[criminal history] On March 2, 2007, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 5 million to the same court on September 13, 2012 as a fine of KRW 2 million due to a violation of road traffic law (driving), a crime of violation of road traffic law (driving), and a fine of KRW 5 million in the same court on January 16, 2015.
[Criminal facts]
1. On January 10, 2017, the Defendant, who violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from Dangerous Driving), driven the Crane car at a speed of 60km per hour from the direction of the Ambassador to the direction of the Crane in the direction of the Crane.
A person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle shall not drive a motor vehicle in a state where normal driving is difficult due to influence of alcohol, and has a duty of care to prevent accidents by safely driving the motor vehicle, such as making a good report on the traffic situation at the front time, operating a steering system accurately, etc.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and found the victim D (Y, 34 years old)’s Karen car that was driven over the median line due to negligence while under the influence of alcohol content 0.180% while driving in the blood, and became the front part of the damaged vehicle due to the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle without reducing the speed due to alcohol.
As a result, the Defendant driven a motor vehicle in a state where normal driving is difficult due to influence of drinking, and suffered injury such as salt, tension, etc. of a tension that requires two-day medical treatment to the victim D, and injury to the victim FF who was accompanied by the damaged vehicle (the age of eighteen) about four weeks, such as inside the left-hand side of the damaged vehicle and the mouth.
2. Defendant 1 who violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) violates Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act on at least two occasions, despite having violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act on at least two occasions.