준강제추행
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s sentence (6 months of imprisonment and 40 hours of order to complete a sexual assault treatment program) is too unreasonable.
2. Recognizing the judgment of the commission of a crime and reflecting it, the fact that the defendant's health is not good, and the fact that he/she must support his/her mother is favorable.
However, the crime of this case appears to have caused the victim to feel a considerable sense of sexual humiliation and a sense of maternity, the victim did not reach an agreement with the victim, and the crime of this case continues to repeat the same crime even though criminal punishment has been imposed three times due to sex crimes, and thus, is highly likely to repeat the crime of this case. In particular, the crime of this case was committed during the period of probation due to forced indecent act, there is no special change in circumstances after the sentence of the judgment below, and other circumstances that are conditions for the sentencing of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex behavior, environment, family relationship, etc., are considered as being too excessive and it is difficult to view that the court below's punishment is unfair.
Therefore, we do not accept the above argument of the defendant's above sentencing.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.