However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On September 26, 2013, around 01:50 on September 26, 2013, the Defendant, at the main point of "D" in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, performed a dispute with the victim E (27 years of age) and the victim E, who was in peril on the customer’s left side of the victim, followed by a beer, which was a dangerous article on the customer’s face, and led the victim to a scam and scam, etc. on the left side of the victim in need of approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding E;

1. A report on the field of violence;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate (68 pages of investigation records);

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Mitigation of discretionary work and mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act ( normal consideration, such as the confession of a crime and the pening of a mistake, the primary charge, and the fact that a full agreement has been reached with the victim);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution;

1. It shall be decided as ordered for the reason under Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc.;