도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. On February 8, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking) and the Road Traffic Act (druning without a license) driving a B-learning car under the influence of alcohol of about 0.142% in alcohol during blood without obtaining a driver’s license from around 500 meters in a range of 50 meters in front of the road, from the road near the neighboring market of the members of the Hanwon-gu other party at Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City to the road in front of 1989-10.
2. No motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Insurance shall be operated on a road;
Nevertheless, the Defendant operated the B-learning car that was not covered by the mandatory insurance stipulated in the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act at the time and place specified in the preceding paragraph.
3. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act by driving the said B-learning car at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, and led to the direction of the market direction for the members of the party, Jung-gu, Sungnam-si.
At the time, since it was night and a place off, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately operating the steering system and steering the steering room and the right and the right of the driver.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to perform his duty on the front side of the DK5 vehicle operated by the victim C who bypassed the right side of the DK5 vehicle in the direction of the proceeding due to negligence that caused the Defendant to neglect to perform his duty on the front side, and received a set of the front right part of the DK5 vehicle.
The Defendant continued to drive a vehicle in the state of driving, and the victim E was driven by the opposite direction while making a sudden internship to get out of the site, and received the part on the left left-hand part of the above fYF Laol car, which was driven by the victim E, as the front left-hand part of the above fYF Laol car.
Accordingly, the defendant's above DK5 car due to the above occupational negligence.