beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.07.13 2015고단5713

사기등

Text

Defendant 2 is punished by imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of this case 801 high group, 2015 high group and 5713 high group and 2015 high group and 6238 high group.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 12, 2005, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for fraud at the Incheon District Court, and completed the execution of the said sentence on February 16, 2007. On August 14, 2013, the judgment was finalized on August 22, 2013 after being sentenced to two years of suspended execution for one year of imprisonment for fraud at the Suwon District Court’s Suwon District Court’s sentence of two years and six months of imprisonment for fraud. On July 3, 2015, the said judgment became final and conclusive on December 4, 2015. On March 25, 2016, the imprisonment for two months and eight months was sentenced to imprisonment for fraud and other crimes. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 27457, Jun. 13, 2016>

"2015 Highest 5713"

1. Around August 2014, the Defendant against the victim C made a false statement to the effect that he/she newly constructed a commercial building from the victim C at the office at the construction site of the new building site located in Seo-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Seo-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City, but he/she listens to the horses that lack of construction cost, and that he/she would allow the victim to complete the construction work so that the additional loan may be made. On September 17, 2014, the Defendant attempted to make the victim obtain an appraisal of the forest land located in Seocheon-gun, Seocheon-do, Gyeonggi-do, which is the victim’s ownership and make an additional loan of KRW 500 million. Accordingly, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect

However, even if the defendant receives money from the injured party, the injured party did not have the intention or ability to obtain the loan.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and received 200,000 won in terms of the appraisal cost on the same day from the victim.

From that time to May 21, 2015, the Defendant, including this, by deceiving the victim at least nine times in total, and received a total of KRW 12,398,000 from the injured party and acquired it by deception.

2. On November 18, 2014, the Defendant’s fraud against the Victim F was detained by G and H on the part of the Victim F due to a violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act by the victim F’s children. On the same day.