아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(성매수등)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
"2017 Gohap 188"
1. Violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse;
A. On March 17, 2017, the Defendant: (a) provided KRW 2.50,00 in return for sexual traffic to H (W) who is a juvenile of the Defendant, who was parked in the “E pharmacy” parking lot located in Busan-gu, Busan-do; and (b) provided 17 years old, a child or juvenile, to H (W) who was aware of through the “G” in the Frando-based car located in the Frando-gu, Busan-do; and (c) provided 2.5 million won in return for sexual traffic; and (d) provided the child or juvenile sexual intercourse on a single occasion.
B. On March 17, 2017, at around 16:07, the Defendant considered to be punished for her child and juvenile under J Messenger’s Messenger’s Messenger’s Messenger’s Messenger’s Messen from the Defendant’s dwelling located in Busan-gu, Busan-gu, and 202 Dong
H. He sent the content that Nibibin will have his child or youth receive KRW 200,000 in return for the commercial sex acts once. He recommended the above H to sell sex.
2. The defendant shall provide 250,000 won to the victim He in return for sexual traffic at the time and time set forth in paragraph (1) of this Article, and at the place, he shall take 2,50,000 won in cash from the victim's wall where the victim was placed in the front line of the driver's car by taking advantage of the gaps of care that the victim might have neglected to wear clothes from the back seat of the driver's car.
L. A. L. theft was committed.
The defendant of "2017 Gohap 281" is a person who has worked as the head of the business team of L Lending Brokerage Co., Ltd. in Daegu-gu Office Office 711.
No person who transmits advertising information for profit by using an electronic transmission medium shall take various measures to conceal the identity of the sender of advertising information or the source of advertising transmission.
Nevertheless, between December 15, 2016 and January 25, 2017, the Defendant stated that “MG community credit loan instructions, employees, and business operators (MG community loan integration theory)” are “MG community credit loan instructions, work employees, and business operators (MG community debt integration theory)”.