2. Of the appeal cost, the Plaintiffs and Defendant.

A. The reasons to be explained by this court are as follows, except for the addition or dismissal of the plaintiffs' claims, and the addition of the judgment on the plaintiffs' claims is the same as the reasons for the judgment of the first instance, and thus, they are cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of

at the bottom of 5 up to 3, 400 up to 3, 2, 300 up to 6,000 up to 6,000

2.(a)

4) The medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital did not perform its duty to explain that, in light of the size of the pattern before the instant surgery, the Plaintiff would be capable of choosing an incomplete medication rather than an incomplete medication in the event that the Plaintiff’s satisfecing is more appropriate than the satisfecing surgery, and that an incomplete satisfecing may occur due to satfegal damage through an operation, and that the satisfecing may be permanently discovered. The 3 and 4 acts above the 7th part of the 1st instance court, the 8th part of the 8th part of the 8th part of the 1st instance court to the court of first instance, and the 1st part of the 1st part of the Seoul University Hospital Hospital’s 0th part of the 1st part of the 10th part of the 1st part of the 1st part of the 1st part of the 1st part of the 2nd part of the 2nd part of the 1st part of the 5th part of the 3th part of the satum.