However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Around November 16, 2016, the Defendant visited the Defendant, who is a public official belonging to the contract office, in order to inform the Defendant of administrative measures due to delinquency in water use fees, the victim D (V, 44 years of age) who was a public official belonging to the Gu Ri-si, Guri-si, and Guri-si, around 15:45, Nov. 16, 2016, when the Defendant was unable to discern things or make decisions due to diversology, and the Defendant, on his own hand, visited the victim in order to guide the administrative measures due to delinquency in water use fees, and caused the victim’s injury, such as a downflow, etc., on the part of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Each police statement made with respect to E and D;

1. A statement prepared by the F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 10 (2) and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate mental and physical drugs;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;