유족급여및장의비부지급처분취소
1. The disposition that the Defendant rendered to the Plaintiff on December 11, 2012 as bereaved family benefits and funeral expenses shall be revoked.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.
Details of the disposition
The net B (hereinafter referred to as the “the net”) started to work in an advanced company on June 18, 2001 (hereinafter referred to as the “Advance”) from 1992 to 2 years from the Red Profit Development (hereinafter referred to as the “red Red Profit Development”), from 1996 to 3 years from the company of the trade name “C”, and from 2000 to 3 years from the company of the trade name “C”, “C”, which is the partner company of the Sam Industries Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “TA”), and began to work in an advanced company (hereinafter referred to as the “C”), and around the end of 2004, the business of the advanced Co., Ltd. was succeeded to the company of the company of the Red Profit Development (hereinafter referred to as the “GI”) to the company of the Republic of Korea.
Red-interest development, C, advanced, and chemical owners are the cooperation companies of Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Modern Heavy Industries”), and D are the cooperation companies of Hyundai Heavy Industries, which are built by Hyundai Heavy Industries and Three Industries.
The Deceased, while working in a successive order in red-interest development, C, D, advanced, and painters, performed the work of managing paint, width, and painting work goods used in painting work.
While the Deceased worked as above, he was diagnosed by the Ulsan National University Hospital around October 2002.
As a result of regular health examinations on April 23, 201, the Deceased was notified by the Ulsan National University Hospital that it is necessary to conduct a close inspection because it is doubtful of an empty and scarcity disease.
On May 13, 2011, the Deceased was diagnosed by the Ulsan National University Hospital with the dystyposis and the dyspology of the dyspology. On October 2, 2011, the Deceased died of the heart due to the chronic dyspology.
On January 27, 2012, the Plaintiff asserted that the deceased’s wife was exposed for a prolonged period of time to harmful substances in the course of his duties and caused the death of a diversative plant, and claimed for the payment of bereaved family benefits and funeral expenses to the Defendant.
On December 11, 2012, the defendant's first diagnosis time of the deceased was less than one year and six months after his entry, and the amount of harmful substances exposed to the deceased.