beta
(영문) 대전지방법원천안지원 2020.10.16 2018고단1812

업무방해등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2018 Highest 1812"

1. Around 00:25 on May 25, 2018, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force by avoiding disturbance for about 30 minutes, such as that, while smoking tobacco under the influence of alcohol at the “D’ restaurant operated by the victim C (hereinafter referred to as “A”), the victim was able to smoke.”

2. Around 01:00 on May 25, 2018, the Defendant, who received a report at the same place as Paragraph (1) and solicited the Defendant to return home, and subsequently, the victim F (son, 32 years of age) who is a police officer belonging to the ASEAN Police Station Edistrict, who was dispatched to the Defendant, expressed the Defendant’s desire to read “the Defendant, who is a police officer, would have to go home to the Defendant, and who would have to go home to the Defendant, she publicly insult the victim.”

3. On May 25, 2018, at around 01:45, the Defendant damaged public objects, as indicated in paragraphs 1 and 2, and was arrested by police officers, such as F, etc., on charges of interference with duties, etc., and was seated in the back seat of the H patrol vehicle, the Defendant dupliced the left side of the vehicle, which is a public object, so that the repair cost would be at least KRW 1.50,000,000.

"2019 Highest 1524"

1. Around May 30, 2019, the Defendant: (a) sold a pipe ( approximately 95 cm in length, 2.5 cm in diameter) which is a dangerous object that was found at the bottom of the victim’s house in Asan-siJ around May 30, 2019, on the ground that the dog in which the victim I was raised was the Defendant at approximately one week before the victim I was the Defendant; (b) on the part of the victim’s house, the Defendant used a pipe ( approximately 95 cm in length, and 2.5 cm in diameter) to put up the victim’s head and bridge.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and destroyed the objects owned by the victim.

2. The special intimidation Defendant is in the state where the victim K (year 42) who has heard sound that the Defendant purchased a dog as referred to in paragraph 1 was the Defendant at the time and place set forth in paragraph 1, and the victim K (year 42) was able to restrain the Defendant.