beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.08.27 2013가합56964

구상금

Text

1. The Defendants jointly committed against the Plaintiff in relation to KRW 200,000,000 and KRW 140,000 among them, from February 1, 2013 to 60,000.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. 1) The Plaintiff is a company with the purpose of non-life insurance business, etc., and the New Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “New Co., Ltd.”) on February 10, 201.

2) Defendant B is a driver employed by Defendant A and driving a motor vehicle C (hereinafter referred to as “instant motor vehicle”) owned by Defendant A for filing a complaint against his/her own (hereinafter referred to as “instant motor vehicle”). In addition, Defendant B is a driver who is an insurer who has entered into an indemnity insurance contract with Defendant A (hereinafter referred to as “instant vehicle”).

3) The Korea Federation of Trucking Transport Services (hereinafter “Defendant Federation”)

B) A mutual aid business entity that entered into a comprehensive deduction agreement with Defendant A is a mutual aid business entity that entered into with the Defendant A. The occurrence of an accident (i) New Co., Ltd. was awarded a subcontract for the construction of the D Waste Reclamation Facility (hereinafter referred to as the “instant construction”).

2) E, E, and F, a worker belonging to the new business, are carrying two copies at the site of the instant construction project, around November 14:10, 201, and the Switzerland equipment of the instant vehicle (which means the equipment attached to the complaint work vehicle, and the working unit in the shape of the breath, all of which are loaded by the people.

(ii) while going up to 4-5 meters above the scars, fall down below the wind cutting down with a merin merin, supporting and mooring each wire pole for the equipment of the Scars (hereinafter referred to as the “instant accident”).

3) In the instant accident, E suffered bodily injury, such as the 7 plenasty and the 1st century, and F suffered bodily injury, such as the 2nd century’s unstable emissions.

C. The Plaintiff paid KRW 140 million to E with insurance proceeds arising from the instant accident, and KRW 60 million to F respectively.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, each entry of Gap evidence 1 to 6 (including virtual number), and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Defendant B, as the driver of the instant vehicle, is sufficiently examined in advance as to the safety of the instant vehicle.