구상금
1. The extent of the property inherited by the deceased H within the scope of the property:
A. Defendant A: 29,712,469 won and 12,721.
On August 25, 200, pursuant to a credit guarantee agreement with the deceased H (hereinafter “the deceased”), the Plaintiff issued a credit guarantee certificate as of December 7, 200 under the general loan of loans, the guaranteed amount of KRW 23,700,00,00, and the term of guarantee on December 1, 201. In the above credit guarantee agreement, the Plaintiff agreed to pay to the Plaintiff damages for delay based on the rate of damages as determined by the Plaintiff from the date of payment on behalf of the Plaintiff to the date of full payment, the fees for delay, the fines for negligence, and the legal procedural expenses (three-dimensional expenses) paid by the Plaintiff for the performance of the guaranteed obligation and the preservation of the said obligation. The Plaintiff did not appear to have been granted the above credit guarantee certificate as security by the deceased on October 25, 2007, and the Plaintiff paid the amount of KRW 63,605,953 on behalf of the deceased on October 25, 2007 to the 201st Family Court.
According to the above facts of recognition, the Defendants are obligated to pay each principal and delay damages indicated in the order corresponding to their respective shares in inheritance among the indemnity debt owed by the deceased against the Plaintiff within the scope of the property inherited by the deceased as the inheritor of the property of the deceased. Thus, the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendants of this case against the Defendants is justified, and it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all.