Seized evidence 1 shall be confiscated.

[Criminal Power] On March 25, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for a special injury by the Daegu District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Daegu Prison on June 21, 2016.

【Criminal Facts】

At around 09:00 on October 9, 2018, the Defendant took the attitude that he would inflict bodily harm on the victim D (the 35 years of age) who is an employee of the Cps(the knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife

Accordingly, the defendant carried a dangerous knife and threatened the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Other closure photographs and photographs;

1. Criminal records as indicated in the judgment: Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiry reports and individual confinement status;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act, Articles 284 and 283 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act for the crime of intimidation [Scope of Recommendation] in the event that the mitigation area (two months to one year), the mitigation area (including those who have been specially mitigated), the exemption area (including efforts to recover damage), or considerable partial damage has been restored / the decision of sentence / the decision of sentence / the decision of sentence / the decision of sentence / the punishment / the decision of sentence / the punishment / the decision of a similar repeated crime (excluding the types of repeated crimes among four categories) / the circumstances below one year and other records, such as the defendant's age, occupation, character, character, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., and the various conditions of sentencing as shown in the argument of this case are determined as the order

D. Unfavorable circumstances: considering the fact that the defendant could have done dangerous results due to the characteristics of the crime place by threatening employees with dangerous things by finding a medical institution, the nature of the crime is not that of the crime.

The defendant committed the crime of this case even during the same period of repeated crime.

The same crime is committed against the accused.