2. The judgment of the court below was agreed with the victim of the instant special injury crime, but the previous conviction was several times including the previous convictions. The instant fraud crime committed against many unspecified persons is inferior to the quality of the crime, the degree of the defendant's participation, the damage to the crime of fraud has not been recovered, and the punishment of the court below is proper in full view of the amount of damage, the defendant's age, character and conduct, and the various sentencing conditions shown in the argument of the instant case, such as the environment. Thus, the defendant and prosecutor's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is groundless, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.