2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. On November 18, 2002, the Plaintiff became a member of B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “instant workplace”) and was diagnosed on February 15, 2007, after withdrawing from around February 15, 2007, with “multi-scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopics” (hereinafter “instant scopic scopic scopics”).

B. On July 23, 2010, the Plaintiff asserted an occupational accident and applied for the approval of the medical care. However, on February 7, 2011, the Defendant confirmed that, as a result of an epidemiological investigation conducted by the Korea Industrial Safety and Health Institute, multiple infections are generally known as having been infected with virus infections, traumas, immunity reductions, and causes unknown. Since it is not confirmed as a result of a clinical examination and an epidemiological investigation on the business environment, the fact that the disease occurred due to duties or the working environment, etc., it is difficult to recognize a proximate causal relation with the Plaintiff’s duties (hereinafter “instant disposition”). As such, the Defendant rendered a disposition not to approve the Plaintiff’s application (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, each entry of Gap 1 through 4 (including virtual numbers) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

가. 원고의 주장 원고는 LCD 판넬(런)에 전기를 꽂아서 화면을 켠 다음 판넬을 한쪽 손으로 잡고 눈 앞에 판넬을 들어 육안으로 색상과 패턴 검사 업무를 하였는바, 무거운 판넬을 쉬는 시간도 없이 들었다

In order to conduct a large number of inferior inspections within the rapid time, it was very difficult to repeatedly and repeatedly work in high speed.

The plaintiff was exposed to the harmful substances during the work process, such as exposure to electromagnetic waves and cleaning using chemical substances, etc.

There have been more than 12 hours a day, and work with fire-proof clothes or electric uniforms has been carried out, and it was difficult to put them into toilets due to the reason that the work clothes have been caused.

The plaintiff worked as the third class to the third class to the third class and the second class.