대여금
1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 20,400,000 within the scope of the property inherited from the deceased C; and (b) October 2014.
Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the plaintiff leased KRW 30,000,00 to C on April 11, 2014 as ten months of the lending period, interest rate of KRW 1,50,000 per month, and KRW 1,50,000 (pre-determined to 90,000). C died on June 24, 2014, the defendant and D died jointly, the fact that the defendant and D jointly succeeded, D reported renunciation of inheritance under Seoul Family Court Decision 2014Ra9080, and the defendant filed a report on renunciation of inheritance under the same court’s 2014Ra9079, and received each judgment from the above court.
According to the above facts of recognition, the Defendant, a sole heir of the deceased C, is obligated to pay the Plaintiff KRW 20,400,000 within the scope of the property inherited from the deceased C, as requested by the Plaintiff, and the damages for delay calculated at the rate of 20% per annum from October 21, 2014 to the day of full payment, which is the day following the day of delivery of the copy of the complaint of this case.
Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.