beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2017.09.13 2017고단1419

정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 15:00 on November 29, 2016, the Defendant used a mobile phone at the Defendant’s residence located in Jongno-gu Seoul and 208, and visited Pins North Korea (www.faceok.com) and reported the Defendant’s notice to the Victim E prepared by D at D’s Pins North Korea, and described as G “Adi F” used by the victim for the purpose of slandering the victim on the comments comments written in D’s text.

1. Sicking male solitary in a state where G is south;

2. G rhythm of the male test with the remaining mast of G, open to the public, and rhyth of the anti-pathy; and

3. D 4.G's proposal by the South-North Korea, and as D d d d d d h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h.

5. Conversion of meta-car dye-car dye-car dye-car dye-car dye-do;

6. 빡쳐서 D 이가 이 글 씀

7. G-gu written and posted a letter stating that G-gu is a superior to G-gu, which is written, and that it is a roller.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly duplicating facts through information and communication networks with a view to slandering the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Evidentiary materials;

1. Application of one copy of Acts and subordinate statutes to a photograph by capturing D's Facebook North Korea;

1. Article 70 (1) of the Act on Promotion of Utilization of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, etc., concerning facts constituting a crime and Article 70 of the same Act and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the defendant did not directly discuss the real name of the victim, and the comments on comments itself do not have much degree of slandering as the fact-finding group, and other factors of sentencing under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the defendant's age, sexual conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., and the circumstances after the crime, etc., are determined by comprehensively taking account of various factors of sentencing under Article 51 of the Criminal Act as stated in the records and arguments

Defendant

(b).