If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

1. From around 22:00 on July 12, 2013 to around 01:45 the following day, the Defendant interfered with the business, as a customer in Ulsan-gu B-gu, Ulsan-gu.

As the victim D (the age of 54, n) said that the Defendant had already been drunk, and the victim D (the age of 54, n) said that “I will not see the match house,” the Defendant provided a common chickens and a so-called 1 disease by referring to why I would see others, and why I would see, I would like to see, I would like to see it.”

During drinking alcohol, among customers, they interfere with the business of the relevant facility by force over about 3 hours and 45 minutes, such as asking tobacco to customers, booming a vision, provoking an article, and putting about 20 customers who were in the same room with “brings, strings,” etc., and making some of the customers in the same room fighting booms, so that they can put a fighting, thereby interfering with the business of the relevant facility.

2. The criminal defendant is a person who has no intention or ability to pay the drinking value.

At the same time as the preceding paragraph, 19,000 won was 19,000 won by providing the victim D with the 1stma of 1st and 1st of friend.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police statement law to D;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Articles 347 (1) and 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (a point of interference with business) and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.