However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 27, 2013, at around 19:28, the Defendant: (a) avoided a disturbance under the influence of alcohol within a cafeteria called “D” located in Kimhae-si, and called, “D,” and called, “I am head to return home in the right side of the police station,” and called, “I am to the right side of the police station,” and called, “I am to the right side of the police station,” and opened the F am to the latter part of the 24sle9684, with the consent of the Defendant, so that I am under the influence of the Defendant to return home to the Defendant under the influence of alcohol. I am to the Western police station in the vicinity of the Pakistan in the Yan-si, Jhae-si, Kimhae-si, and then I am to the latter. I am to the end of the police station’s duty.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes No. 2, 3, 5, and 6 in the list of evidence submitted by the prosecutor;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (i.e., the confession and the fact that he/she seriously reflects his/her mistake, the fact that he/she was under the influence of alcohol at the time, and the fact that the defendant was punished for the same crime, but has no record of criminal punishment heavier than that of

1. Probation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;