도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.
Punishment of the crime
Around 00:05 on August 24, 2014, the Defendant was a driver of the DBA car, and around 00:00 on August 24, 2014, the Defendant was negligent in performing his duty at the time of Jeonju in the direction of the Defendant’s operation while neglecting his duty at the time of Jeonju in the direction of the passage from the south-Eup, the south-Eup, the south-west, the south-west, at the market room of the five-day city in the direction of the Defendant’s proceeding, operated by negligence in the course of duty, and operated by the victim E (58 years old) who was directly located in the direction of the direction of the Defendant’s proceeding, the lower part of the FK5 taxi’s back to the right-hand part of the said small E-5 taxi in the direction of the Defendant’s proceeding, and did not take any measures to remove the danger and impediment to traffic by immediately stopping the 1,618,098 cab to repair the said 5 taxi.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident (1 report), and a report on a traffic accident (1) (2) and an actual survey report;
1. Each police statement of E;
1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of the motor vehicle inspection and written estimate for maintenance;
1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Articles 148 and 54(1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of fines and other traffic accidents, which are not separate cases, became a major case due to the erroneous judgment and behavior of the defendant and his parents.
In other words, the defendant tried to be exempted from punishment on the ground of the mother as a driver in order to conceal a traffic accident after having escaped from a traffic accident.
Even if parents led the above concealment act, the defendant, who is an adult, should eventually consent to it and take the responsibility for it.
However, it seems that the defendant has no history of criminal punishment, is against his age, and that he was unable to properly distinguish the defendant from his age, and the victim was not punished for the defendant, and the victim was faithfully engaged in school life, and the professor in charge and the mother were in charge.