The remainder, excluding the dismissed part, shall be reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Since only the Defendant appealed against the guilty portion of the judgment below, the dismissed part of the judgment below was separated and finalized, and was excluded from the scope of the judgment of this court.

2. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. It is difficult to view that the Defendant threatened the victim with regard to attempted coercion 1). The Defendant’s act of demanding information does not go against the victim’s will. 2) There is no fact that the Defendant forced the victim to commit indecent act with regard to indecent act by compulsion.

3) The Defendant’s accusation of the Z as a crime of coercion against the Defendant in the absence of awareness of the falsity of the accusation is not recognized. However, the lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

3. Determination

A. As to the Defendant’s assertion of mistake of facts and misapprehension of legal principles, the lower court also asserted that the Defendant is the same as this part of the lower judgment.

The lower court’s determination on the assertion by the Defendant and defense counsel

1.(a)

B. (1) In (1) In early 2015, the Defendant became aware of the fact that the victim sent personal time while making a business trip with T and T and a business trip, which is male, and that this fact was “the misconduct that needs to be hidden as a woman, and the family is in danger of the fluoral,” and (2) the victim sent a letter to the Defendant on May 23, 2016, stating that “The Defendant sent a letter to the fluorous female,” and then asked the Defendant to check the facts of the above paragraph (1) at any other place, and the Defendant so requested.