2. It is recognized that the victim's degree of injury was light and the defendant agreed with the victim, that the vehicle operated by the defendant is less dangerous, and that both the defendant and his spouse are disabled persons and are extremely difficult to economic circumstances.

However, even though the Defendant had been punished twice due to drinking driving, the Defendant was driving without the pertinent license, and the blood alcohol concentration at the time was considerably high to 0.160%, and the personal damage was caused by the traffic accident.

In light of such circumstances and other conditions of sentencing as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, background and consequence of the crime, etc., it cannot be deemed that the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable as it is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.