The defendant is a person in charge of overall control over the removal work of general house C and safety management with the head of the site of the corporation B.

On February 22, 2014, at around 09:00, the Defendant mobilized sprinks to reduce fugitive dust in order to reduce fugitive dust.

At the same time, since there was an area where pedestrians walk along a sloped slope, and water was fice due to low temperature at the A.M., the person in charge of the removal work and safety management thoroughly managed the ice connected to the water level so that water does not flow out, or the ice clocksium was spreaded together with the calcium, and the safe pedestrian passage was created by installing safety fences, etc. so that pedestrians can walk safely without any particular measure, the victim E (n, 61 years old) who passed through the ice clock by negligence so that they can spread water without any particular measure.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as chest 12, which requires approximately 12 weeks of treatment due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statement to E;

1. Although it is recognized that there is no record of criminal punishment against the defendant for the reason of sentencing under Article 268 of the relevant Article of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the victim is trying to punish the defendant by suffering serious injury to the extent that he/she should receive treatment for a considerable period of time in the future, even after the victim was hospitalized in the hospital due to the instant injury and received treatment for a considerable period of time, taking into account the defendant's age, character and conduct and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the conditions of sentencing as shown in the arguments of