The Defendant, with the victim C, referred to as the “compact” and “compact”.

1. In order to borrow money from six lending companies, such as D Cases lending, at a place where it is difficult to know on August 2014, the Defendant is obliged to pay money to the victim at least three (3) months at least at least at least at the latest.

The term “joint and several sureties” refers to “joint and several sureties requested.”

However, at the time, the defendant has a debt worth 60 million won, and he was not able to repay the loan due to the recovery of credit after one month.

On August 11, 2014, the Defendant: (a) had the victim deceiving the victim as above and had the victim know the trade name in the Dongbcheon-si of Gyeonggi-do; and (b) had the above lending company sign the joint and several surety contract of the above lending company received by facsimile in his country; and (c) had six lending companies jointly and severally guaranteed the Defendant’s total amount of loans of KRW 37,00,000,000 in the form of a crime list; and (d) obtained economic benefits equivalent to the same amount.

2. On November 2014, at a place where it is not known to the Defendant, the Defendant: (a) he/she is obliged to fully pay the principal and interest of KRW 37 million to the victim; (b) he/she is obliged to lend the principal and interest of KRW 35 million to the bank in the name of the principal and interest; and (c) he/she is obliged to repay the loan of the bank in the name of the bank in the name of the principal and interest of KRW 35 million; and (d) he/she is obliged to borrow the loan of the bank in the name of the bank in the name of the principal and interest of KRW 37 million.

“The purport was to the effect that “.....”

However, there is a debt that the defendant has to pay at the time, and even if the victim loans money, the victim did not have an intention to repay the debt that the victim guaranteed as provided in paragraph 1.