교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
The Defendant appealed on the ground that the sentence of the lower court (10 months of imprisonment without labor, 2 years of suspended execution, 160 hours of community service order, 40 hours of attendance order, and probation) is too unreasonable. However, in light of the various sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments in the instant case, even if the Defendant’s vehicle was involved in the taxi mutual aid association to which the Defendant was admitted and paid some insurance money to the victim under the pretext of medical expenses or agreement, it is not deemed that the sentence imposed on the Defendant is too unreasonable on the grounds stated in its reasoning.
Since the appeal by the defendant is groundless, it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.
(However, there seems to be a clerical error in the second page 7-8 of the judgment of the court below in the "original frame for all-patients".