beta
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.12.15 2017나2045071

대여금

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited the same reasoning as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the cases where the written indictment is written as follows, and thus, it is acceptable as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article

2. Parts to be dried;

A. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the expression “this Court” is written in the form of Seoul Southern District Court en bloc.

B. The fourth 4-5 of the judgment of the court of first instance was dismissed, and the first 4-5 " was dismissed."

C. The fourth to fifteen parallels in the judgment of the court of first instance shall be followed as follows.

In light of the fact that C applied for the payment order of this case on the premise that C is a creditor, and then the Defendant raised an objection to the payment order of this case on the premise that C applied for the payment order of nursing personnel expenses on the premise that C is the creditor, the Plaintiff’s testimony to the effect that C applied for the payment order was limited to nursing personnel expenses, as alleged by the Defendant, and that C applied for the payment order of this case on the premise that C was the Plaintiff, as alleged by the Defendant, was not sufficient to recognize that the Plaintiff had suspended the payment period of the loan of this case, and there is no other evidence to support this, the Defendant’s defense is not acceptable.”

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.