except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. At around 00:15 on July 30, 2014, the Defendant: (a) 00:15, when the game was held in the D District District of the Ansan Police Station D, which was located in the Gyeonggi-si, and (b) rancing the victim E, who was a police officer who had been working in a situation at the same time, was fluoring the victim’s speech that he would sit in the spot from the victim E, who was a police officer who had been working in the situation at the same time; (c) and (d) made the victim’s desire, such as “chilling down, flus of public power, flus of a bitch, f

2. While the Defendant, at the same time and place as mentioned in the above paragraph (1), arrested a flagrant offender as a crime of insult and prepared a written confirmation of the arrest of a flagrant offender, he had the intent to gather personal information of pro-gu G in order to conceal the unpaid fines.

On July 30, 200: G, resident registration number: H (26) and residence: G: G’s I, 103 Dong 113, and 10:15 on July 30, 2014, the Defendant arrested a flagrant offender at the D District District of the Ansan Police Station D District, and confirmed that he was given the summary of the suspected offense, the reason for arrest, and the defense counsel, and the opportunity for defense upon receipt of notification that he/she may request a review of legality of arrest. On July 30, 2014, the Defendant signed G’s signature in the column for confirmation of the arrest certificate of a flagrant offender, and affixed his/her name.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising a certificate, the Defendant forged a letter of arrest certificate of flagrant offender in G name, which is a private document related to a certificate of fact.

3. The Defendant, at the same time and at the same place as above 2, issued a forged flagrant offender arrest certificate to police officers and police officersJ, who are affiliated with the Ansan Police Station, who knew of the forgery, as seen above, as if it were a document duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement of K;

1. A certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act and Article 234 and Article 234 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;