공무집행방해
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
On June 12, 2014, at around 22:40 on June 12, 2014, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender who was injured by pro-dong C and was detained in a detention room of the racing police station, and immediately found the fact that he was confirmed.
At around 23:05 on the same day, the Defendant heard the speech that the above C was arrested and detained by police slopes of police officers on duty at the above E office, and took a bath to the above F, and took a bath to the above F, and took the face of the F at one time with the lush floor.
Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties concerning the above F's on duty as a police officer.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Each protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant;
1. Statement of each police statement concerning G and F;
1. Investigation report (a copy of the detention warrant of the suspect who has caused this case shall be attached), a copy of detention warrant, a criminal investigation report (Attachment of a written judgment interfering with business), and the application of statutes of one of the written judgment
1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;
1. The suspended sentence of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act provides that the basic area of the first category of the obstruction of performance of official duties (the scope of recommendations] (the decision of the sentence of the suspension of execution of official duties in June to April) (the decision of the sentence of the suspension of execution of official duties in June to April) [the decision of the sentence] the necessity of strict punishment of the obstruction of official duties, the confession and rebuttal, and other sentencing conditions that can be revealed through records and arguments, such as the defendant's age, happiness, family environment after committing criminal acts, etc., shall be considered.