A. Facts of recognition 1) The Defendant is C and D et al. (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

(2) On June 8, 2013, C driving a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with the Defendant’s vehicle (Ma1) around 12:47 on June 8, 2013, and driving on the part of the Defendant’s vehicle (Ma1), at a speed of 61 to 60km/h from the middle industry in the middle industry of Korea at the speed of 60km between the two lanes, and the front side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle and the front side of the Defendant’s vehicle conflict with each other.

(hereinafter “instant accident”. At the entry point of the Defendant vehicle, the signal lights are cut off, and there is a signal sign called “yang, dangerous, and sun-dried.” At the entry point of the Plaintiff vehicle, a yellow flickering signal is installed, and the signal sign called “risk and sun-dried” is installed while the yellow flickering signal is operated.

3) Due to the instant accident, Plaintiff B suffered from superior measures, such as the pressure frame, left-hand thalone, and safab, etc. due to the instant accident, and Plaintiff A, who was on board the top of the steering force of Plaintiff A, suffered from an injury to the blood mouth, right-hand stalone, etc. due to the livering damage. 4) Meanwhile, Plaintiff A received KRW 29,678,00,00 as a large amount of money due to the damage of Plaintiff A’s vehicle, and the committee for deliberation on the dispute over the reimbursement of automobile insurance determined the ratio of negligence between Plaintiff B and Dongbu Fire Insurance Co., Ltd., an insurance company of Plaintiff vehicle, and Defendant 80%.

[Reasons for Recognition: Facts without dispute, Gap's evidence, evidence Nos. 2, 3, 7, 13, 14, 15, and the purport of the whole pleadings]

B. According to the above fact of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable for the damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to the accident of this case as an insurer.

C. The defendant has limited liability.