However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 8, 2017, the Defendant, at the “C convenience store” located in PP on December 23:31, 2017, as follows: “In order to calculate the purchased goods, the Defendant, “I have first been in the Republic of Korea, and you have to calculate why I have first been in the Republic of Korea.”

In this bruth theory, the victim's shoulder was tightly pusheded three times with a shoulder, and the victim's breath was tightly pushed and pushed down with a breath to damage the victim's shoulder.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (Attachment to a photograph by cutting CCTV at a convenience store recorded on the page of the suspect's crime) and to a photograph by cutting CCTV images;

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence is that the defendant has a large number of criminal records, committed violence against the victim at his age, and did not agree with the victim.

However, the facts that the defendant is led to confession and reflect, and that the degree of damage is minor shall be considered as favorable to the defendant, and the punishment shall be determined as ordered in consideration of various sentencing factors in the records and trials of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, motive of the crime, and conditions before and after the crime.