However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2018. 12. 4. 22:50경 고양시 일산서구 B에 있는 ‘C’ 음식점 앞길에서 술에 취하여 행패를 부리다가 112 신고를 받고 출동한 일산서부경찰서 D지구대 소속 경사 E로부터 귀가하라는 말을 듣게 되자 화가 나 “개새끼야”라고 욕설을 하면서 위 경찰관의 멱살을 잡아 밀치고, 주먹으로 때리려는 시늉을 하는 등 경찰관의 112 신고 업무에 관한 정당한 직무집행을 방해하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. A written statement of F and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes notifying departments related to reporting 12 cases;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The sentence shall be determined as ordered in consideration of all the sentencing conditions stipulated under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the fact that there is no agreement with the police officer who has inflicted damage on the reason of the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, the degree of physical damage by the police officer is not limited, the confession and reflect of the crime, the fact that the crime is committed, the fact that the defendant is contingent, the age of the defendant, and