provided that this judgment has become final and conclusive.

Defendant

A and Defendant C have internal relations from March 2013, and Defendant B had worked as an employee of the “E” Maurel operated by Defendant A around that time with the latter part of Defendant A.

The Defendants had concerns over the possibility that Defendant C may be detained abroad when it is discovered that Defendant C is an illegal Stayer status. As such, Defendant B and Defendant C conspired to obtain the legally able status of Defendant C by reporting their marriage without the genuine intention of marriage.

1. According to the foregoing public offering, Defendant B prepared a false marriage report on Apr. 5, 2013 at the public viewing service center, which is located in 203 on Apr. 5, 2013, and submitted a false marriage report to a public official in charge of false name and submitted it to the public official in charge of false name to enter the false marriage information system, which is a public electronic record, managed electronically in the same way as the family register register, into the family register information system.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to make a false report to a public official to record false facts in the same electronic record as the original copy of the notarial deed.

2. The Defendants conspired in collusion with the Defendants to preserve public electronic records containing false facts at the above time, time, and place, and exercised them.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each prosecutor's interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. Application of the marriage relation certificate, family relation certificate, and marriage report Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 228(1) and 30 (a) of the Criminal Act, Articles 229, 228(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment for each type;

1. The former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent crimes;

1. As set forth in Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, the suspension of execution (the defendants) is below.