beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2013.08.21 2013고합112

강도상해등

Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for four years and for three years and six months, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On June 15, 2006, Defendant B sentenced one year and six months to imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc. at the Daejeon District Court on December 6, 2007 and one year and six months to imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc. at the same court on December 6, 2007. On October 16, 2009, Defendant B was sentenced to three years for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc. at the Daejeon District Court on July 31, 2012, and completed the execution of the sentence

【Criminal Facts】

1. Defendant B’s violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (thief) committed theft in a manner that, around 04:00 on February 12, 2013, the Defendant borrowed from the victim, while drinking alcohol together with the victim G via the Internet, one scarbera in an amount equivalent to one million won at the market price owned by the victim and went back to the restaurant.

Accordingly, the defendant habitually stolen another's goods.

2. On May 20, 2013, the Defendant injured the Defendant: (a) on the roads near I convenience stores located in Y in Y in Y in Y in Y in Y in Y in Y in Y in Y in Y in Y in Y in Y in Yacheon-gu, Yacheon-gu; (b) on his hand and Y B in 10 times; and (c) on his part, B was on the part of his part of Y in the unexprisoned part of

3. The Defendants, who suffered bodily injury by robbery, were active as Internet club members in around 2007, and were aware of each other. From May 12, 2013 to May 20, 2013, the Defendants were aware that they were able to see “humping the convenience point” while drinking alcohol together at the Sacheon-si Sacheon-si, Yan-si.

At around 23:20 on the same day, the Defendants came ahead of the “I convenience point” as set forth in the above Paragraph 2, which is operated by the Victim J (59). Defendant B first set up 1 disease, etc. into the convenience store, and then confirmed that Defendant A had no other person around the place of convenience.