If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

At around 01:20 on November 13, 2016, in front of the building B in Bupyeong-si, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim as a member of the victim D, who was called up upon the report of 112 on an violent incident between the Defendant’s daily activities, in order to disregard the Defendant’s demand that the victim D, who was called up, would be a match, and was involved in the said dispute. While the Defendant’s daily behaviors and behaviors are committed, the Defendant provided the victim’s abusive theory, such as “hume flick flick flick flick flick fl. f. f. f.,” and publicly insulting the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D (List 6);

1. E statements (List 4);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint (List 1);

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the same Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the order of provisional payment have been led to the confession, reflectivity, absence of criminal records for the same kind of offense, contingent crimes in the state of primary action, and the finding of the victim several times.