2. The fact that the Defendant recognized all of the instant crime is favorable to the Defendant.

On the other hand, when considering all of the sentencing conditions in the instant case, such as the circumstances unfavorable to the Defendant, amount of fraud, Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, motive for the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., such as the fact that the Defendant committed several times, but did not completely recover from damage until now, and that the Defendant continuously committed the instant crime even though a summary order was issued due to the same type of crime around February 2017, it is not deemed that the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.